www.freeenergiescongress.com
GREAT BRITAIN NEWS
Ex-Govt Lawyers: Iraq War Was Illegal

Miranda Richardson
Sky News
January 26, 2010

Two of the Government’s most senior lawyers at the time of the Iraq war have said they believed it was illegal without a second UN resolution.

 

In a written statement Sir Michael Wood, who was the Foreign Office’s chief legal adviser in the run-up to the conflict said: “I considered that the use of force against Iraq in March 2003 was contrary to international law.

“In my opinion, that use of force had not been authorised by the Security Council, and had no other legal basis in international law.”

Sir Michael told the inquiry the then-foreign secretary Jack Straw rejected advice from his department’s lawyers that the war would be unlawful without a second Security Council resolution.

Read entire article

 
Britain exits longest recession on record – just

Britain emerged today from the longest recession in modern history, but the economy grew by only 0.1 per cent between October and December — far below expectations of a 0.4 per cent rebound.

Today’s figure is only the first of three readings of GDP for the fourth quarter by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The reading is so low that a downward revision could leave the country still in recession.

Joe Grice, the chief economist for the ONS, noted that recent revisions up or down had been between 0.1 per cent and 0.2 per cent.

Related Links

  • Britain on brink of recession exit
  • How to stop Britain going bust again
  • Future of a generation in jeopardy, CBI warns
Multimedia

  • POLL: has your recession ended?
  • GRAPHIC: Britain on the mend

Britain is the last big economy to emerge from a full-blown downturn. The United States, Japan, China, Germany and France all climbed out of recession in the third quarter, between July and September, last year.

A change in GDP could emerge as the country gears up for a general election, which must be held before June 3, although Gordon Brown is facing calls for a poll as early as March.

The ONS will publish its revised reading on February 26 and a final figure in March.

The Government will have to battle even harder to sustain the recovery.

The main drivers of the minimal growth in the economy came from the retail and motor sector, both of which have been propped up by government intervention.

Colin Ellis, European economist with Daiwa Capital Markets, said: "These sectors will have been boosted by the pre-announced VAT rise in January and the car scrappage scheme — suggesting that, on an underlying basis, the economy only stagnated at best."

It has raised fears over the strength of the recovery as the VAT rise and the dire weather this month are likely to have hurt high street spending, and the scrappage scheme is scheduled to come to an end soon.

In 2009 the economy fell by 4.8 per cent, the fastest pace of decline in a single year for 88 years, and more than in any other 12-month period since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Britain has been in recession for six quarters. The technical definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth.

Alistair Darling said that the economy was on the path to recovery, but he was cautious.

“I’ve always said that because of all the uncertainty around we should be very cautious,” the Chancellor said.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty around the world — there will be further bumps along the road, there’s no doubts about that.

“I think we are now on a path to recovery. I am confident that the steps we have taken have put us on the right path.”

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) today revised up its figure for British GDP growth from 0.9 per cent to 1.3 per cent for 2010, in line with the Treasury's own forecast for 1.25 per cent growth this year.

However, it places the UK among the stragglers in the world economy, with the US expected to grow by 2.7 per cent and Japan by 1.7 per cent.

French and German GDP will rise by 1.4 per cent and 1.5 per cent respectively in 2010, the IMF forecasts.

There is a rosier picture in 2011, with the IMF predicting that the UK economy will grow by 2.7 per cent, up from a previous forecast of 2.5 per cent.

But this falls far below the Treasury's forecast for 3.5 per cent growth, which has already attracted criticism from economists for being overoptimistic.

"Despite of the revisions, the recovery in advanced economies is still expected to be weak by historical standards, with real output remaining below its pre-crisis level until late 2011," the report read.

George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “After this great recession, any signs of growth are welcome. But, these very weak growth figures show that Gordon Brown’s Government left us badly prepared for the recession and badly prepared for the recovery.

"We urgently need a new model of economic growth that includes a credible deficit reduction plan that keeps mortgage rates low, creates jobs and doesn’t choke off recovery.”

Howard Archer, the chief European and UK economist for IHS Global Insight, said: "This is another desperately disappointing GDP release. While the UK officially exited recession in the fourth quarter of 2009, it could only crawl out.

"This reinforces our suspicion that recovery will be gradual and prone to losses of momentum."

It also added to the likelihood that the Bank of England would keep interest rates at an historic low of 0.5 per cent, at least until late this year.

Mr Brown warned yesterday that the country was still in danger of tumbling back into recession if a Conservative government prematurely withdrew the economic stimulus.

He said: “Policymakers in the United Kingdom must remain vigilant. That is why we are all agreed around the world that we must reduce our deficits steadily, according to a plan, but that we must do nothing this year which would put recovery, growth and jobs at risk.

“The biggest mistake we in Britain and individual countries could make would be to withdraw now from the supportive actions we need for growth and jobs.”

David Cameron, the Conservative leader, who has promised to hold an emergency Budget if the Tories are elected, said that it was time for Labour to “do the right thing”, and accused the Government of "moral cowardice" in failing to deal with the country's budget deficit.

“Our recession, the great recession, is the longest and deepest since the war and coming out of recession does not mean that our debt crisis is over,” he said.

“In fact, far from it: Labour’s debt crisis is now the biggest threat to our recovery, so we will only get this recovery right if we start right now on a proper debt reduction plan.”

He added: “The Government’s promise to halve the deficit in four years has, frankly, failed to convince those who we need to have confidence in Britain’s economic future.”

In a reference to Mr Osborne’s proposal to cut tax credits and Child Trust Funds for the middle classes, Mr Cameron spoke of the need for action to show they were serious in intent.

“That means some reduction in public spending plans in this coming financial year,” he said.

Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC, said: "These figures show just how fragile the economy is. With the threat of a double-dip recession looming large, it would be madness to cut public spending now."

 
Iraq inquiry: Government legal official will disclose advice given to ministers
From The Times
January 25, 2010

Iraq inquiry: Government legal official will disclose advice given to ministers

Protestors hold a 'Mass die in' in Parliament Square, February 15, 2005 in London, England

Protesters hold a 'die in' in Parliament Square in 2005 in protest at the Iraq War: demonstrators are expected to return for Tony Blair's visit to the Iraq inquiry on Friday

 Suzy Jagger, David Brown

Sir Michael Wood, the former top legal adviser at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, has been given permission from the Attorney-General to break with protocol and disclose advice given to ministers in the build-up to the Iraq war.

The move by Baroness Scotland effectively allows Sir Michael to give unrestricted evidence to the Chilcot inquiry when he appears tomorrow morning. His comments will form part of what is expected to be an explosive week of testimonies from officials, the former Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith and Tony Blair.

Sir Michael is expected to reveal to the inquiry disagreements within the Government before the decision was taken to attack Iraq. He will be questioned over whether it was the case that lawyers believed the war would have been unlawful without a second UN resolution.

Lord Goldsmith is expected to receive intense questioning when he gives evidence on Wednesday. He is thought to have changed his mind about the legality of the war in the days leading up to the invasion in March 2003. He will be scrutinised over details of conversations he had with Mr Blair before announcing his judgment that a war against Iraq would be lawful.

Related Links

  • Mass protest looms as Blair faces Iraq inquiry
  • Lib Dems set to gain the most from Chilcot fallout

Mr Blair faces questioning on Friday over his secret discussions with President Bush, his involvement in the preparation of dossiers on the threat from Iraq, his decision to commit British troops and whether he misled Parliament to take the country into war.

Among the audience for his hearing will be parents of some of 179 British personnel who died in Iraq. Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon died aged 19, said that the families would not attempt to disrupt Mr Blair’s evidence.

She said: “There will be a lot of tension, and a lot of families will feel quite unsettled. They will be listening and taking things in. They are not going down to cause any disruption, they actually want to hear what’s being said. We want the truth about why we did go into Iraq. I think Tony Blair has convinced himself, but now he has to convince the public and convince the families.”

Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Sir Michael’s former deputy, is due to give evidence tomorrow morning. She resigned in 2003, arguing that an invasion without sanction from the United Nations would represent a crime of aggression. She will be questioned on whether it was the case that Sir Michael had told Lord Goldsmith of his legal reservations about the invasion.

Gordon Brown will also have to give evidence, but not until the end of next month or early March. The findings from the inquiry will not be made public until after the general election, expected in May.

David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, said yesterday that the Government had learnt lessons from the invasion of Iraq. He said: “We will continue to learn lessons because the truth is it has been far harder to win the peace in Iraq than to win the war. As the Prime Minister said, the postwar planning needed to be far, far better. That is absolutely evident.”

Mr Miliband dismissed suggestions that one of the messages emerging from the Chilcot inquiry was that his department’s accurate predictions about the problems of occupying Iraq had been overlooked by the rest of the Government. He said: “It is tempting to say that the Foreign Office always gets it right, but it’s not true. It is a corporate decision. These decisions are very, very difficult.”

Appearing this week

Today

Des Browne, Secretary of State for Defence (2006-08) 2pm. Noted in 2006 that Iraq was now “not as bad as under Saddam”

John Hutton, Secretary of State for Defence (2008-09) 3.30pm. Resignation in 2009 was derided by Field Marshal Lord Bramall, former Chief of the Defence Staff, as “nothing short of dereliction of duty under fire”

Tomorrow

Sir Michael Wood, Legal Adviser, FCO (2001-06) 10am. Puzzled over the legality of going to war without UN resolution

David Brummell, Legal Secretary to the Law Officers (2001-04) 11.30am. Legal adviser who examined case for war

Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Deputy Legal Adviser, FCO (2001-03) 2pm. Believed war in Iraq was illegal

Margaret Beckett, Foreign Secretary (2006-07) 3.30pm. Once said: “We never hear about the things that have gone better in Iraq”

Wednesday

Lord Goldsmith, Attorney- General (2001-07) 10am.Wrote a letter to Geoff Hoon, then the Defence Secretary, stating that a war in Iraq would be illegal

Friday

Tony Blair 9.30am. Spectators for this appearance were picked by ballot.

 

 
Dead Osama Warns of Imminent Attack in Latest IntelCenter Fabrication

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
January 25, 2010

In a patently absurd follow-up to the made-over Osama by the Justice Department (using the face of an Italian communist), the CIA and Defense Department linked propaganda unit IntelCenter has released yet another Osama audio tape. IntelCenter was caught adding its logo and that of As-Sahab to the same layer of a purported al-Qaeda video, according to Neal Krawetz, a researcher and computer security consultant. The As-Sahab Foundation for Islamic Media Publication is said to be al-Qaeda’s media production house.

A researcher discovered that al-Qaeda and IntelCenter logos were added to an Osama video at the same time.
featured stories   Dead Osama Warns of Imminent Attack in Latest IntelCenter Fabrication
Osama

“Osama bin Laden’s word choice in the latest audio message attributed to him is seen as a ‘possible indicator’ of an upcoming attack by his Al-Qaeda network, a US monitoring group warned Sunday,” reports AFP.

The phrase “Peace be upon those who follow guidance,” appears at the beginning and end of messages “released in advance of attacks that are designed to provide warning to Al-Qaeda’s enemies that they need to change their ways or they will be attacked,” said IntelCenter.

Audio releases were Osama bin Laden’s normal vehicle for statements, with video statements having been very rare since September 11, 2001, according to IntelCenter.

In 2002, scientists in Switzerland indicated that an audio tape attributed to Osama bin Laden was a fake. Researchers at the Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, in Lausanne, said the message was recorded by an impostor. The CIA and Pentagon stopped using video to propagate the al-Qaeda myth after the Fat Bin Laden video and the Grecian Formula video were widely criticized and easily debunked. Recent video tapes show images of Bin Laden before he died in late 2001.

 

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods
The IntelCenter is painfully aware that anybody who pays attention understands Osama is dead. “Consequently, audio messages are the rule, not the exception, and thus speculation as to health or anything else merely because the message is in audio form and not video does not hold up to analytical scrutiny,” the propaganda front explained.

 

The SITE Intelligence Group, a sister organization staffed with ardent Zionists, quoted the dead CIA asset on September 25. In that fabrication, Osama supposedly told European countries to withdraw their forces from Afghanistan. The warning came prior to Obama’s announcement to increase the number of troops in the country in early December.

Earlier this month, the FBI was caught with its pants down when it used the image of a Spanish communist leader as a template for a new image of the dead al-Qaeda frontman. The westernized Osama in the sloppily constructed montage was designed for audiences in the United States and Europe.

 
Households face £1,000 fines from officials with police powers if they refuse to fill in their censu

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/7043822/Households-face-1000-fines-from-officials-with-police-powers-if-they-refuse-to-fill-in-their-census-forms.html

Householders could be fined up to £1,000 if they fail to fill in the census forms next year amid fears that millions of people could refuse to take part.

 

By Christopher Hope, Whitehall Editor
Published: 2:47PM GMT 25 Jan 2010

A dedicated team of “non-compliance” officers with police powers will be dispatched across the country to crack down on anyone who fails to fill in the forms.

This group will have official powers to caution residents and if necessary take them to court for failing to fill in the forms.

 

The census, an official count of the population which takes place every 10 years, is used by local and central Government to determine spending priorities.

However there is a growing concern that the next census, on 27 March, might be ignored by millions of thousands of Britons.

Nick Hurd, Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office, said: “Labour’s plans for the next Census threaten to destroy public support. It is so intrusive and bloated that I fear many people will simply throw it in the bin or skim over the questions.

"The Government’s response of hiring an army of census police will alarm law-abiding families and shows how Labour have no concern for civil liberties.

"Just because Ministers have legal powers to fine people £1,000 for not answering does not mean it’s right for the state to bully householders and threaten to drag them to court.

"This is yet another sign of the bully boy state that Labour have created and the gradual criminalisation of middle Britain, fining families for the most minor of breaches of state-imposed rules.”

Each 32 page form asks detailed personal questions about families across the country. The forms have to be filled in by the head of the household and take an average of 40 minutes.

Rehearsals in some parts of the country for the 2011 count, which took place last October, found that the response rate among volunteers was as low as 21 per cent. In similar trials before the 2001 count, there was a 53 per cent response rate.

Ministers have now signalled a new ‘get tough’ approach towards non-compliance. Under the 1920 Census Act, citizens can be be cautioned under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and fined £1,000 for failing to answer questions.

However the powers have not been properly enforced previously. In 2001 just 38 people were fined for not filling in their forms.

The Government has now announced that a special “non-compliance unit” will force people to fill in their forms. Those that refuse to will be able to be interviewed under caution using the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, taken to court and fined.

Baroness Crawley, a Labour whip, told peers in the House of Lords last month: “In 2001 it was part of the regular field staff’s responsibility to caution people.

“This time there will be a dedicated non-compliance staff and prosecutions will be pursued in cases of persistent refusal to respond.”

In theory more than one million people could be caught by the crackdown, although in practice the powers are only likely to be used on people who refuse to fill in the forms.

In 2001, the ONS has admitted that it had to "impute" information for 6.1 per cent of households who failed to fill in the forms - more than 1.5million families.

Ministers have refused to publish the prosecution guidance for its census staff, insisting that “ONS considers any such guidance to be covered by legal and professional privilege”.

One in three forms are not filled in completely, leaving large blanks which are filled in by ONS staff who use an average answer using responses from neighbours.

A spokesman for the ONS said it had been expecting the lower response rate in some areas because they had been chosen to be "quite challenging" compared to others.

He said: "Every household in England and Wales is legally required to complete and return a census questionnaire.

"Inevitably, some will not do so and our field teams will try to persuade them to change their mind and complete the census questionnaire and comply with the Census Act.

"We will have a team working on non-compliance and although householders will be offered many opportunities to complete the questionnaire, for those that continue to refuse to do so legal action may be necessary.

"If legal action is required then cases would be heard in a magistrates court. The amount of the fine under the Criminal Justice Act is at the discretion of the magistrates - with a current maximum £1,000 fine.

"Pursuing a prosecution against a person would be very much the last resort at the end of a long process of offering people information and assistance."

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 13